TENNESSEE COURT OF APPEALS RULES IN A CASE HANDLED BY WEINTRAUB, STOCK & GRISHAM: EMPLOYEE’S REFUSAL TO PERFORM WORK BECAUSE OF FEAR HE WILL BE VIOLATING STATE REGULATION WILL NOT GIVE RISE TO RETALIATORY-DISCHARGE LAWSUIT. Supreme Court Broadens the Scope for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII Supreme Court Rules that "whistleblower" statements by Public Employees are afforded no Constitutional protection when made pursuant to job-related duties. New Jersey Court Holds That an Employer Can Be Liable for Employee's Possession of Child Pornography. OFCCP Issues Final Rule Defining Internet Applicants For Federal Contractors Court finds that time spent attending and traveling to and from mandatory counseling sessions is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Summary: Court holds that employers must compensate non-exempt employees for time spent during non-working hours receiving mandatory medical treatment for a work-related injury. Summary: Under the Association Provision of the ADA, employers may not discriminate against an employee based on that employee's association or relationship with a disabled individual. EA Case: SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT FITNESS-FOR-DUTY CERTIFICATIONS need only State that the employee is able to return to work. EA Case: D.O.L. Advisory: New Interest in Enforcement of Labor-Management Reporting Requirements EA Case: William T. Moorer v. Baptist Memorial Health Care System, et al. EA Case: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Food & Commercial Workers Union EA Case: Week of November 19, 2004 EA Case: Week of November 11, 2004 EA Case: Week of July 20, 2004 EA Case: Week of July 29, 2003 EA Case: Week of March 9th, 2003 EA Case: Week of April 18th, 2003 EA Case: Week of April 2nd, 2003 EA Case: Week of March 13th, 2003 EA Case: Week of February 5th, 2003 EA Case: Week of January 27th, 2003 EA Case: Week of January 6th, 2003 Each week, Weintraub, Stock & Grisham highlights a recent court decision of interest to Employers as part of its effort to keep Employers informed of recent labor and employment law developments.
TENNESSEE COURT OF APPEALS RULES IN A CASE HANDLED BY WEINTRAUB, STOCK & GRISHAM: EMPLOYEE’S REFUSAL TO PERFORM WORK BECAUSE OF FEAR HE WILL BE VIOLATING STATE REGULATION WILL NOT GIVE RISE TO RETALIATORY-DISCHARGE LAWSUIT. Supreme Court Broadens the Scope for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII Supreme Court Rules that "whistleblower" statements by Public Employees are afforded no Constitutional protection when made pursuant to job-related duties. New Jersey Court Holds That an Employer Can Be Liable for Employee's Possession of Child Pornography. OFCCP Issues Final Rule Defining Internet Applicants For Federal Contractors Court finds that time spent attending and traveling to and from mandatory counseling sessions is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Summary: Court holds that employers must compensate non-exempt employees for time spent during non-working hours receiving mandatory medical treatment for a work-related injury. Summary: Under the Association Provision of the ADA, employers may not discriminate against an employee based on that employee's association or relationship with a disabled individual. EA Case: SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT FITNESS-FOR-DUTY CERTIFICATIONS need only State that the employee is able to return to work. EA Case: D.O.L. Advisory: New Interest in Enforcement of Labor-Management Reporting Requirements EA Case: William T. Moorer v. Baptist Memorial Health Care System, et al. EA Case: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Food & Commercial Workers Union EA Case: Week of November 19, 2004 EA Case: Week of November 11, 2004 EA Case: Week of July 20, 2004 EA Case: Week of July 29, 2003 EA Case: Week of March 9th, 2003 EA Case: Week of April 18th, 2003 EA Case: Week of April 2nd, 2003 EA Case: Week of March 13th, 2003 EA Case: Week of February 5th, 2003 EA Case: Week of January 27th, 2003 EA Case: Week of January 6th, 2003
TENNESSEE COURT OF APPEALS RULES IN A CASE HANDLED BY WEINTRAUB, STOCK & GRISHAM: EMPLOYEE’S REFUSAL TO PERFORM WORK BECAUSE OF FEAR HE WILL BE VIOLATING STATE REGULATION WILL NOT GIVE RISE TO RETALIATORY-DISCHARGE LAWSUIT.
Supreme Court Broadens the Scope for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII
Supreme Court Rules that "whistleblower" statements by Public Employees are afforded no Constitutional protection when made pursuant to job-related duties.
New Jersey Court Holds That an Employer Can Be Liable for Employee's Possession of Child Pornography.
OFCCP Issues Final Rule Defining Internet Applicants For Federal Contractors
Court finds that time spent attending and traveling to and from mandatory counseling sessions is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Summary: Court holds that employers must compensate non-exempt employees for time spent during non-working hours receiving mandatory medical treatment for a work-related injury.
EA Case: SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT FITNESS-FOR-DUTY CERTIFICATIONS need only State that the employee is able to return to work.
EA Case: D.O.L. Advisory: New Interest in Enforcement of Labor-Management Reporting Requirements
EA Case: William T. Moorer v. Baptist Memorial Health Care System, et al.
EA Case: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Food & Commercial Workers Union
EA Case: Week of November 19, 2004
EA Case: Week of November 11, 2004
EA Case: Week of July 20, 2004
EA Case: Week of July 29, 2003
EA Case: Week of March 9th, 2003
EA Case: Week of April 18th, 2003
EA Case: Week of April 2nd, 2003
EA Case: Week of March 13th, 2003
EA Case: Week of February 5th, 2003
EA Case: Week of January 27th, 2003
EA Case: Week of January 6th, 2003
Each week, Weintraub, Stock & Grisham highlights a recent court decision of interest to Employers as part of its effort to keep Employers informed of recent labor and employment law developments.
Practice Areas
Attorneys
About us
Employment Alerts
News
Seminars
Our Clients
Links
1715 Aaron Brenner Drive, Suite 512 Memphis, Tennessee 38120 901.526.0431 Fax: 901.526.8183 E-Mail: office@weintraubstock.com
Web Site © 2002 Weintraub Stock & Grisham, PC - All Rights Reserved
