Employment / Labor Alert:
 
OFCCP Issues Final Rule Defining Internet Applicants For Federal Contractors

Background

On October 7, 2005, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs ("OFCCP"), a division of the United States Department of Labor, released a final rule defining the term "Internet applicant" for purposes of the recordkeeping requirements for federal contractors under federal discrimination law. 70 FR 58946 (Oct. 7, 2005). The OFCCP published this rule pursuant to its power to administer and enforce Executive Order 11246, which prohibits all nonexempt contractors, who do at least $10,000 of business with the federal government, from discriminating in employment decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The executive order also requires federal contractors to take affirmative action to guarantee that equal employment opportunities are available in all aspect of the workplace.

To assist in enforcing the executive order, the OFCCP requires federal contractors to obtain gender, race, and ethnicity data on employees and, where possible, on applicants. The OFCCP's new rule attempts to clarify the considerable confusion that has arisen over how recent technological advances such as the Internet affect contractors' recordkeeping obligations and whether individuals who submit resumes via electronic means are "applicants." The new rule became effective on February 6, 2006.

The New Definition

Under the final rule, an individual who applies for a job with a federal contractor is an "Internet applicant" if he or she satisfies all of the following criteria:
The individual submits an expression of interest in employment through the Internet or related electronic data technologies.
The company considers the individual for employment in a particular position.
The individual's expression of interest indicates that he or she meets the basic qualifications for the position.
The individual at no point in the contractor's selection process prior to receiving an offer of employment from the contractor, removes himself or herself from further consideration or otherwise indicates that he or she is no longer interested in the position.
"Consider"

The final rule states that a contractor "considers an individual for employment in a particular position" if the contractor evaluates the individual's expression of interest (application or resume) to determine if the individual is qualified for the position. Thus, a contractor "considers" an individual under the new rule anytime it looks over an individual's resume for information relating to the individual's qualifications for a job. The final rule also states that, if the contractor considers any expressions of interest made electronically, the Internet applicant definition applies to all expressions of interest for that particular position regardless of their means of communication. For example, if a contractor received 30 resumes by email and 30 paper resumes by traditional mail, the Internet applicant definition applies to all 60 expressions of interest.

Although the final rule defines "considers" very broadly, there are several exceptions. The final rule states that a contractor need not consider any expression of interest that fails to comply with the contractor's standard procedures for applying for a position. For example, the rule states that if an employer has a policy of considering resumes submitted only through its website, then the employer need not consider any resume sent by other means. The employer's actual practice will determine if this exception applies. Further, the contractor must have an established application procedure before it can claim this exception. The final rule also states that contractors need not consider any expression of interest that an individual submits without reference to a specific position, such as unsolicited resumes. Finally, the final rule states that a contractor, faced with a large number of expressions of interest, does not "consider" any individual for employment by using data management techniques such as of random sampling or absolute numerical limits to reduce the number of expressions of interest. For example, if a contractor received 20,000 resumes for a particular position, it could limit the number of applicants by taking a random selection of 50 resumes for consideration or by considering only the first 100 resumes submitted. However, each sample must be a fair representation of the racial, gender, and ethnic characteristics of the entire pool of expressions of interest.

"Basic Qualifications"

Under the final rule, the definition of the "basic qualifications" of a position depends on whether the contractor decides to seek applicants by advertising a position publicly or by using alternative methods of searching. Under the final rule, if the contractor decides to advertise a position, the "basic qualifications" for that position are the qualifications stated in the advertisement that individuals must possess before the contractor will consider the individual for the position. However, if the contractor decides to use alternative methods of seeking applicants for consideration (such as searching existing resume databases), "basic qualifications" are those qualifications that the contractor chooses to use to search for applicants before the contractor considers any expressions of interest for the position. In the latter situation, the contractor must record the criteria used for the search before actually conducting the search.

The final rule states that all basic qualifications must meet three requirements, regardless of whether the contractor advertises for the position. First, basic qualifications must be non-comparative. For example, the final rule states that a qualification that an individual must have at least two years experience would be non-comparative. A requirement that an individual must have the most experience out of all the applicants would be comparative. Second, the final rule states that basic qualification must be objective and not depend on the contractor's subjective judgment. For example, the final rule states that a requirement that an individual have an accounting degree would be objective; but a requirement that an individual have a degree from a "good school" would not. Finally, basic qualifications must be relevant to the performance of the particular position and must enable the contractor to accomplish business-related goals.

Recordkeeping Requirements

Under the final rule, contractors must retain all expressions of interest that they actually consider. Contractors must also retain all records identifying the individuals that the contractor contacted regarding interest in a particular position. However, the recordkeeping requirements change slightly when a contractor uses a resume database (external or internal) to search for qualified individuals for a position. Under the final rule, if a contractor uses an external, third-party resume database such as Monster.com, the contractor does not have to retain every resume that the database contains. The contractor must only record the resumes of job seekers that the contractor considered after determining that the job seekers met the basic qualifications of the position. In addition, the contractor must record the position for which it made each search, the substantive search criteria used in the search, and the date of the search. Under the final rule, contractors must maintain these records regardless of whether the individuals qualify as "Internet applicants." The recordkeeping requirement varies slightly if the contractor uses it own internal resume database to search for job seekers instead of an external database. In this situation, the final rule states that a contractor must maintain a record of each resume added to the database as well as the date it was added, the position for which the contractor made the search, the date of the search, and the substantive search criteria used in the search. Under the final rule, the contractor must also maintain these records regardless of whether the individuals qualify as "Internet applicants."

Implications

The OFCCP's new rule will have far-reaching implications for federal contractors. This article intends only to give a brief summary of the rule. Federal contractors should seek the advice of legal counsel to determine the individual impact that this new rule will have on their business.

Practice Areas

Attorneys   

About us

Case of the Week 

 Supreme Court Decisions  

News   

Seminars  

 Our Clients  

Links   

 



1715 Aaron Brenner Drive, Suite 512
Memphis, Tennessee 38120

901.526.0431 Fax: 901.526.8183
E-Mail:
office@weintraubstock.com

Web Site © 2002 Weintraub Stock & Grisham,  PC -   All Rights Reserved